In 2001, one year before the withdrawal of then attorney, now senator David Baira http://www.davidbaria.com from our case. We placed actions before the district court in Hattiesburg Mississippi gaining two rulings as part of judge graves order. The first part of the ruling explains the actual intent of the court. It claimed a dismissal for not completing discovery. Fact is that discovery was complete to the point of settlement.The second part had everything to do with the cause before the court.
That being, a return to the Hinds county court because it held our awards. All orders stated that by jurisdiction of the Hinds county court any attempt to revive our claims would have to occur before this very court. Revive ? As stated the matter was already settled in 1998 Here’s that action of attorneys all the way to the Failed Trial.
The problem for the attorneys was that the second part of the ruling was attached to the first. Prior to acceptance of the Vicksburg offer on the Maries it was agreed to by attorneys and the court that the Maries were not to be allowed any action whats so ever against the listed defendant of this cause. $ 84 million dollars changed that.
The original order to exclude the Maries from all actions was refered to as judge Graves January 1998 order. This worthless order is all this court ever held as a cause to dismiss. This ruling was issued throughout the other attempts to redress which included the district court in New Orleans as well the 5th, circuit court of appeals
Being directed to the Hinds county court by other courts, motions for relief were filed with Hinds county in 2005. We held every right to file per relief as it was proven by judge Graves in his other order denying defendant motion to dismiss. Here’s a hearing notice of 2005 Filings. Still another denial of relief accompanied a claim by the court we were again dismissed by the Graves January 1998 order.
As the fraudulent claims near their end. We again recently motioned the court per relief. It’s clear via court documents were owed money. As the court is required to present its actions legally we were copied of court actions related to our claims. This would not be allowed or even possible if we were dismissed as alleged for the last 10 years. It is our understanding the court must inform us of their actions. Here’s our Latest Pleadings and copied Latest Pleadings pt. 2 from the court. It was thought the only copy of documents we had were here. To bad huh? It’s my understanding it cost $ 300 to get this done.
Still the court has not responded to our latest pleadings. The docket does confirm we are self represented. Given the recent local activities these folks need someone who can understand their courts magic and that isn’t me. So guess what ? More To Come!